DR. VITUS BLOG |
- BIBLE SCHOOL
- FOOD AND NUTRITION
- FOOD AND NUTRITION
- PARENTS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
- MIGRANT EDUCATION
- MIGRANT EDUCATION
- EDUCATION FOR ALL
- EDUCATION TERMS
- NURSING
- NURSING
- NURSING
- DRUG ADDICTION IN SCHOOLS
- TEAMWORK
- NOVEL
- ACTING
- BUSINESS IDEAS FOR STUDENTS
- PRISON EDUCATION
- STUDENT RETENTION
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:51 PM PDT |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:49 PM PDT Food and nutrition are the way that we get fuel, providing energy for our bodies. ... Water is an important component of nutrition. Fats, proteins, and carbohydrates are all required. Maintaining key vitamins and minerals are also important to maintaining good health. Food & Nutrition - Healthline |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:49 PM PDT Food and nutrition are the way that we get fuel, providing energy for our bodies. ... Water is an important component of nutrition. Fats, proteins, and carbohydrates are all required. Maintaining key vitamins and minerals are also important to maintaining good health. Food & Nutrition - Healthline |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:47 PM PDT |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:41 PM PDT A school for the children of white migrant farm workers, circa 1945 Children of migrant workers struggle to achieve the same level of educational success as their peers. Relocation causes discontinuity in education, which causes migrant students to progress slowly through school and drop out at high rates. Additionally, relocation has negative social consequences on students: isolation from peers due to cultural differences and language barriers. Migrant children, defined as those who relocate because of involvement with agriculture- related industries or other seasonal work, [1] are also at a disadvantage because the majority live in extreme poverty and must work with their parents to support their families. These barriers to equal educational attainment for children of migrant workers are present in countries all over the world. Although the inequality in education remains pronounced, government policies, non- governmental organizations , non-profits , and social movements are working to reverse its effects. Barriers to educational success Cultural differences Cultural differences that cause difficulties in assimilation and also lead to prejudice and xenophobia against migrant families are common deterrents from receiving equal educational opportunities. These prejudices can be formalized by restrictive regulations, or they can be informal but negatively affect the learning atmosphere of a school. Students who don't feel welcome or wanted because of their migrant status are less likely to remain in school. [2][3] [4] Additionally, students who struggle with cultural adjustment often fail to form connections and make friends in school, which affects their academic achievement. [5] Language differences Language differences are another common barrier to educational success. Migrant students that speak a language other than the region's dominant language struggle with basic comprehension and literacy , which affects success in school. [2][3] Even students who are fluent in the regions dominant language but face challenges with the written or academic form of the language are often placed in lower-level or special education classes that have the potential to undermine their academic proficiency. Additionally, while a student may have a high level of language acquisition, cultural differences that include short answer responses, unexpected expressions, and mannerisms, can be misunderstood as language deficit. Schools that have contemplated a separate program for second language learning face challenges with limited resources and an insufficient amount of participating students. Language challenges amongst migrant students create a significant barrier given that language deficiency is often tied to alienation and ridicule from peers, and in some cases, academic punishment. [6] Lack of information Migrant parents are often unaware of their children's right to education or are unfamiliar with the structure of the local public education system. For example, many migrant farmworker parents in the United States do not know they have a right to hold copies of their children's transcripts and school records, which are needed to enroll students in new schools. This makes transferring schools more difficult, taking time away from the student's education. [7] After moving to a new place, parents must focus their energy on finding work and providing for their families, which often means that they do not have time to explore educational options for their children. Additionally, most migrant parents speak a different language, which also affects their ability to receive information. [3] Psychological difficulties Trauma and other psychological difficulties are common among migrant populations, especially refugees who are forced into migratory status due to political, social, or religious turmoil at home. Adjustment to a new culture, language, and home is also difficult and can lead to psychological strain on migrant families. [3] According to a 2008 study conducted by the Universities of Melbourne and Hong Kong, migrant students are more prone to depression and separation anxiety than their non-migrant peers. [8] This is apparent in the United States where undocumented students who succeeded in making the difficult journey across the border face psychological difficulties due to fear of being separated from their families through deportation. [9] Another factor contributing to increased rates of depression and anxiety among migrant youth is discrimination in school. In the University of Melbourne study, the demographic that faced the most psychological difficulties were migrant teenage boys who had experienced discrimination in school and/or domestic conflict. [8] Residential dislocation Many difficulties arise due to the movement of migrant students from one school to another. Children often must adjust to new curricula, testing requirements, and they also must navigate different systems of credit accrual. [10] When migrant students move during the middle of a school year, they are often discouraged from enrolling mid-way through a semester, which disrupts education and has lasting psychological effects. Additionally, when students (especially those in migrant farmworker families) anticipate frequent dislocation, they are less likely to enroll in advanced classes that would increase their prospects of attaining a post-secondary education. [7] Living conditions This large field is filled with mobile homes. Temporary accommodation for many migrant workers working on the acres of orchards of Selling Court Farm. Migrant and immigrant children are four times as likely to live in substandard, crowded housing conditions than are non-migrant and non- immigrant children. [9] Many migrant farmworkers live with a large number of extended family members in migrant camps or temporary housing. This density of people in a small, poorly lit and sparsely furnished space is not conducive to studying. Migrant farmworker camps are located close to agricultural fields and not necessarily within walking distance of the local schools, which poses a problem when reliable transportation is also an issue for some families. [7] Many living accommodations have minimal cooking appliances or refrigeration, which for many migrant students means more time spent preparing meals than studying. [5] Some of the migrant worker's accommodations also lack fresh drinking water or sanitation facilities, which increases migrant student's risk of getting sick. [5] Cost The cost of schooling can also prevent equal access to education. Migrant families, especially migrant farm-working families, have low socioeconomic status and can't afford to pay extra fees on schooling. Even in countries where there are no extra fees for migrant students, there is often an economic disincentive to sending a child to school when they could be working to supplement their parents' incomes. [2] [3][4] In the United States Demographics The exact demographics of migrant students in the United States are difficult to calculate because they move across state and national borders, have different levels of citizenship status, and have limited English proficiency, complicating survey and census data. [2][11] However, in 2002, the US Department of Education , estimated that there are 783,867 migrant children who meet the federal definition of "migrant" as set forth in the eligibility requirements for government support (see Government programs below). This refers to children who have moved school districts within the last 3 years due to agricultural work or work in related industries. Race The racial breakdown of these migrant students is 86% Hispanic, 8% White, and less than 3% Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Asian/Pacific Islander. [1] Language 84% of these students speak little to no English, and about 90% speak a language other than English in their homes. The states with the highest level of students with limited English proficiency are Arizona (with 51% LEP migrant students) and Texas (with 37% LEP migrant students). [2] Location Distribution of migrant students in the U.S. [2] State/ Territory Number of MEP Percentage of U.S. Total California 166,793 30.8% Texas 95,703 17.6% Florida 33,068 6.1% Puerto Rico 21,224 3.9% Michigan 19,167 3.5% Oregon 18,494 3.4% Education Of all of the foreign-born migrants in the United States, 22% have less than a 9th grade education. This percentage breaks down differently by country of origin, with migrants from Asia arriving with the most education and migrants from Latin America arriving with the least. [12] Region of Origin Percent of population 25+ years with less than a 9th grade education Total foreign born 22.2% Europe 12.7% Asia 10% Latin America 34.6% Other regions 7.3% Native 4.7% Region of Origin Percent of population with Bachelor's degree or higher Total foreign born 25.8% Europe 32.9% Asia 44.9% Latin America 11.2% Other regions 36.8% Native 25.6% With regards to educational attainment, only six percent of foreign-born migrant farmworkers have completed 12th grade. [13] Legislation and policy Starting in the 1960s, the United States' government has passed a series of legislation intended to improve the lives of migrant and immigrant students. In 1968, the Bilingual Education Act allocated funding to individual school districts for the creation of bilingual education programs. As part of the Equal Educational Opportunity Act (EEOA) of 1974, the federal government required schools to recognize the language barriers in migrant communities and offer support for non-English speaking students. [14] The No Child Left Behind Act , however, created new testing requirements that make it difficult for migrant students who might transfer school districts before taking a required test, negatively affecting their ability to progress in school. Government programs Migrant Education Program In 1965, as part of President Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty ", Title I of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was framed to help support economically disadvantaged students within the United States. However, this act failed to address the specific non-economic barriers faced by migrant workers and their families so it was amended in 1966 to include the Migrant Education Program (MEP). [1] MEP provides support for children of migrant workers through educational services such as extended school days, summer programs, ESL classes, etc. Eligibility requirements are solely based on the mobility of children and not on their economic or cultural struggles as migrants. This was because Title I already focuses on economically disadvantaged children, so it was assumed that children who qualify for MEP would be receiving benefits from those pre-existing anti-poverty programs. To be included in the Migrant Education Program, children must have had moved school districts for temporary or seasonal agricultural work within the past 3 years. [1] The definition of who qualifies has changed several times since 1966. In 1974, the MEP expanded in scope by including migratory fishing, meat-packing, and other agriculture-related jobs into the categories of eligibility. This was also the year that the period of eligibility was increased from 3 years to 6 years after relocating school districts; however, in 1994 with the passage of the Improving America's Schools Act , it was returned to 3 years. In 1994, the definition of who qualified for MEP was further limited to those children who moved school districts for agriculture-related work that represented their family's "principle means of livelihood." [1] In 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act re- authorized MEP and mandated that the federal funding is focused on the "neediest students" with the "highest risk of academic failure". [2] Although NCLB re-authorized MEP, the main goals of the program reflect what was already laid out in the 1960s. These goals include supporting educational programs to address educational disruptions, protecting migrant children from being penalized for the differences between State curriculums and graduation requirements, designing assistance programs to address the special needs of migrant children. [15] The Migrant Education Program also facilitates coordination of educational services between states. [2] The Migrant Student Record Transfer System (MSRTS) and the New Generation System (NGS) collect students' records and mails them between school districts, which helps provide continuity in education for students who move across state lines. [1] The primary criticism of the EDEA's Migrant Education Program is its constantly evolving definition of "migrant student", which makes counting the number of migrants and analyzing statistics difficult. Second, not all migrants are treated equally by the EDEA: former migrant families that have permanently settled down are not included in the definition of "migrant" so they aren't eligible for the benefits of MEP despite still being at a disadvantage. Third, the MEP doesn't resolve the problem of students moving schools across state lines, learning different curriculums, and then struggling with state- specific standardized tests. [16] High School Equivalency Program The High School Equivalency Program (HEP) is designed to assist migratory and seasonal farm workers to obtain the equivalent to a high school diploma, to find additional skill training or post- secondary schooling, or to find employment. Each year, it serves at least 7,000 students who qualify for the program by being 16 years of age or older and not currently enrolled in school. [17] The HEP is tailored to the needs of migrant workers by being flexible and allowing students to attend classes based on their own convenience. Additionally, the HEP provides free transportation, and all of its staff members are bilingual. [18] College Assistance Migrant Program The College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP) is the only national support program aimed at supporting migrant students through the college experience. CAMP was originally created through the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity program of 1972 before being shifted to the U.S. Department of Labor the following year and to the U.S. Department of Education in 1980. CAMP is funded through discretionary grants that are granted to different non-profit organizations and institutions of higher education. These grants are awarded so that different institutions can provide financial aid, career counseling, tutoring, summer enrichment programs, etc. for migrant students. [19] One of the criticisms of CAMP is that there are not enough spaces available for every eligible student who applies for support. Right now, CAMP only supports roughly 2000 college students per year. [20] Furthermore, due to an increase in undergraduate tuition rates, the number of students supported by CAMP has decreased. [19] Migrant Education Even Start The Migrant Education Even Start Program is focused on improving the literacy of migrant children and adults by supporting existing family literacy projects that operate through the government, universities, private organizations, etc. [21] The Even Start program is focused on increasing children's and families' capabilities by using migrant families' existing resources, cultural traditions, and networks to jumpstart their success. The instructional services included in this program include Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, English as a Second Language, and GED certification. The downside to the Even Start program is that many adults are not able to complete their education due to time constraints and lack of childcare. [22] Nonprofit assistance In addition to government programs, many non- profit organizations work to help migrant workers and their children achieve educational success. Many programs focus on assisting migrant workers to secure work and decent living conditions, while other programs focus on education. Non-profit organizations offer different types of educational services for migrant workers and their children. Some work with migrants to upgrade or teach technical skills that would be helpful for finding employment. Other organizations aim to educate migrants on workplace rights, so that they are knowledgeable on how to handle workplace abuse, which is common among undocumented migrant workers. [23] The most widely utilized form of non-profit assistance is English as a Second Language (ESL) education. Of the 20% of crop workers that have taken at least one adult education class, 10% took English language classes. [24] After English language education, many non-profits offer GED education and tutoring because passing the GED can increase educational and occupational opportunities. [25] Organizations such as Project Avanzando in California provide GED instruction, and services to help students transition into college. [26] For adult learners, participating in these programs can be difficult due to lack of transportation, childcare, confidence, or flexibility in work schedule. [26] Chances of attending adult education classes are higher for crop workers with the most previous educational experiences as well as for authorized workers. Unauthorized workers have a 10% chance of participating in classes versus the 32% chance of authorized workers. [24] Educational success The educational achievement gap between migrant children and non-migrant children is prevalent across the United States. Migrant students generally have lower standardized test scores than the district or state-wide average. [27] In addition to inequality in test scores, there is a persistent graduation gap between migrant and non-migrant students. The national drop-out rate among migrant farmworker students is 50%. [15] In the population of Hispanic immigrants, graduation completion rates correlate to the age in which the student migrated to the United States. The earlier a student immigrates to the United States, the higher their chances are at completing high school. [25] Age when immigrated to US from Mexico Graduation rate [25] 15 – 21 years 28% 5 – 15 years 40% 0 – 5 years 78% These high drop-out rates are often the result of too many school absences, which is common for students who need to support their families by working in the fields or babysitting younger siblings. Before dropping out, increased absences can lead to migrant students being held back a year in school. The more this happens, the wider the age discrepancy between students becomes, which furthers the likelihood of dropping out of school. [5] Possible solutions Because of the complex and interwoven nature of the different issues facing migrant students, there is no consensus of how to solve the inequalities in educational opportunity, attainment, and achievement. Members of the University of Texas at Austin argue that the creation of "advocate educators," whose role it is to support the rights of migrant students and act as a solution for bridging gaps between educational institutions and students. [28] A 2001 study conducted along the Texas-Mexican border concluded that advocate educators who demonstrated cross-cultural empathy and an understanding of the nature, context, and needs of migrant farmworkers fostered the educational success of migrant students. [28] Teachers who are better educated on the experiences of migrant farmworkers will help eliminate prejudice and low expectations of students, which in turn, will encourage students to perform better in school. Along these lines, it is also argued that combatting prejudice and racial stereotypes within the wider community will help decrease prejudice in school and help migrant students. [5] Other suggested interventions include finding a more efficient way of making up absences or missed curriculum due to school transfers and increasing the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers. Studies suggest that students have to stay after school constantly to make-up missed work lose motivation and become quickly discouraged with the educational system. By raising the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers, policy makers would decrease the opportunity cost of education because children would no longer be needed to financially support the family. [5] In China Classroom in a school for migrant students in Beijing (Dongba district). See also: Migrant School The primary form of migration within China isn't that of rural-rural farming migration, but that of rural-urban migration. Through the hukou system, a form of citizenship registration, the Chinese government divides citizens into one of two categories of: urban or rural. Historically, this has created a hierarchy between urban and rural citizens because strict regulations give urbanites more access to healthcare, education, food, etc. Migration has led to a changing demographic of cities. According to the 2010 Census, 210 million urban-to-rural migrants are living in cities, without official hukou registration. Of these migrants, about 20 million are children between the ages of 6 and 14 years struggling to receive quality education because they are not registered within the school district. [29] Many local governments require that everyone complete at least 9 years of education; however, migrant children weren't allowed to enroll in urban schools until 1996. The Ministry of Education issued "Provisional Measures for the Education of Migrant Children" in 1998, but because this was not actually legally binding, many factors continue to prohibit migrants from receiving education: The hukou system requires that rural children must pay extra fees to attend urban schools. [30] School administrations require migrant children to show at least 9 official documents before enrolling, including a temporary residence certificate (which requires that the child's parents have a work permit and money to pay for the certificate). Many public schools require fees like the "education compensation fee" and the "temporary schooling fee" specifically for migrant children. [4] For rural migrant children who do succeed in enrolling in state schools, discrimination is prevalent: in most schools, migrant children do not receive official grades and can not receive academic honors. Because of this, many parents choose to send their children to unlicensed, privately run migrant-specific ("black") schools. The quality of education in these schools is poor because they lack the same resources as state schools—specifically qualified teachers. Depending on the region, these "black" schools are also under threat of closure. In 2007 in Shanghai , every unlicensed migrant school in the center of the city was closed. However, schools on the outskirts of the city and in the majority migrant Xiamen Special Economic Zone , 34 unlicensed schools were allowed. Researchers cite the Chinese government's quest for "population quality" as the primary reason for continued exclusionary policies against rural migrants. However, there are other consequences to the continuation of these policies, as explained by Charlotte Goodburn: In South Africa School children in Hermanus, South Africa South Africa's migrant population is mainly composed of refugee groups from other countries in Africa. The South African Constitution guarantees refugees and asylum seekers the right to education. However, in addition to the widespread xenophobia and prejudice, migrants face many systemic barriers that reduce their educational attainment. [31] One such barrier in South Africa is that many migrants are turned away from public schooling because of a lack of documentation (such as report cards, transfer forms, birth certificates, etc.) Second, language difference is a significant barrier for students from French or Portuguese- speaking countries who must continue their education in the predominantly English-speaking South Africa. Third, according to the Gauteng Department of Education, the recent influx of migrants has "led to enormous pressure on the education system, resulting in overcrowding in ... schools." [3] South African civil society organizations, such as People Against Suffering, Oppression and Poverty ( PASSOP ) and Agency for Refugee Educational Skills and Advocacy are working to combat the issue of migrant education. Community based social movements such as the Equal Education movement are fighting for educational equality in South Africa through research, analysis, and activism. The Three2Six Project, which is donor- funded, also helps by offering free schooling to migrant children who are turned away from public schools. [3] See also Achievement gap in the United States Educational attainment in the United States Educational inequality Job migration Migration in the People's Republic of China Multicultural education Office of Migrant Education Racial achievement gap in the United States Working class education References 1. ^ a b c d e f Branz-Spall, Angela Maria L. (2003). "Children of the Road: Migrant Students, Our Nation's Most Mobile Population". Journal of Negro Education. 72 (1). 2. ^ a b c d e f g h Kindler, Anneka L. (1995). "Education of Migrant Children in the United States". Directions in Language and Education. 1 (8). 3. ^ a b c d e f g Hlatshwayo, Mondli (2014). "The Right to Education for Child Migrants in South Africa". School Psychology International. 35 (3): 266–279. doi: 10.1177/0143034313511004 . 4. ^ a b c d Goodburn, Charlotte (2009). "Learning from migrant education: A case study of the schooling of rural migrant children in Beijing". International Journal of Educational Development . 29 : 495–504. doi : 10.1016/ j.ijedudev.2009.04.005 . 5. ^ a b c d e f Martinez, Yolanda G. (1996). "Migrant Farmworker Students and the Educational Process: Barriers to High School Completeion". The High School Journal. 80 (1): 28–38. 6. ^ McBrien, Lynn (2005). "Educational Needs and Barriers for Refugee Students in the United States: A Review of the Literature" (PDF). Review of Educational Research . 75 (3): 329– 364. Retrieved 3 February 2018. 7. ^ a b c Solis, Jorge (2004). "Scholastic Demands on Intrastate and Interstate Migrant Secondary Students". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 8. ^ a b Wong, F. K. D. (2009). "Correlates of psychological wellbeing of children of migrant workers in Shanghai, China". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 44 (10): 815–824. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0003-y . 9. ^ a b Waters, Mary (2007). The New Americans: A guide to immigration since 1965. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 10. ^ Baca, Leonard (2004). "Foreword". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 11. ^ "Farmworker Factsheet: Demographics" (PDF). ncfh.org . National Center for Farmworker Health. 12. ^ Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo (2001). "Globalization, Immigration, and Education: The Research Agenda". Harvard Educational Review. 71 (3). 13. ^ Carrol, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). U.S. Department of Labor . 14. ^ Pappamihiel, Eleni. "The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant education in our courts and government". Scholars in the Field: Challenges in Migrant Education. 15. ^ a b "Part C: Education of Migratory Children" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 19 October 2014. 16. ^ Papamihiel, Eleni (2004). The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant Education in Our Courts and Government . WP AEL Inc. pp. 13–27. 17. ^ "Migrant Education--High School Equivalency Program" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. 18. ^ Veldzquez, Loldu (1996). "Voices from the fields: community-based migrant education". New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 70 : 27–35. 19. ^ a b "Invisible Children: A Portrait of Migrant Education in the United States". National Commission of Migrant Education, Washington, DC. 1992. 20. ^ "Migrant Education --College Assistance Migrant Education Program" . ed.gov . 21. ^ "Migrant Education Even Start" . ed.gov . 22. ^ Ward, Patricia (2004). "An Integrated Approach: Even Start Family Literacy Model for Migrant Families". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 23. ^ Martin, Nina. "There is Abuse Everywhere: Migrant Nonprofit Organizations and the Problem of Precarious Work". Urban Affairs Review. 48 (3). 24. ^ a b Carroll, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). US Dept of Labor. 25. ^ a b c Grogger, Jeffrey (2002). Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of Mexican Americans. San Francisco, California: Public Policy Institute of California. 26. ^ a b Pablo, Jasis (2010). "All for Our Children: Migrant Families and Parent Participation in an Alternative Education Program". Journal of Latinos and Education . 9 (2): 126–140. 27. ^ Marcus, Kenneth. "Migrant Students: Resources for Migrant Children Similar to Other Students but Achievement Still Lags" (PDF). Florida Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. 28. ^ a b Salinas, Cinthia (2004). "Creating successful academic programs for Chicana/o High school migrant students: the role of advocate educators". High school journal. 87 (4). 29. ^ Chen, Yuanyuan; Feng, Shuaizhang (2013). "Access to public schools and the education of migrant children in China". China Economic Review. 26 : 75–88. doi: 10.1016/ j.chieco.2013.04.007 . 30. ^ Liang, Zai; Por Chen, Yiu (2007). "The educational consequences of migration for children in China". Social Science Research . 36 : 28–47. doi: 10.1016/ j.ssresearch.2005.09.003 . 31. ^ Amisi, Baruti; Ballard, Richard (2005). "In the Absence of Citizenship: Congolese refugee struggle and organisation in South Africa". External links Office of Migrant Education Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of Use • Privacy • Desktop |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT A school for the children of white migrant farm workers, circa 1945 Children of migrant workers struggle to achieve the same level of educational success as their peers. Relocation causes discontinuity in education, which causes migrant students to progress slowly through school and drop out at high rates. Additionally, relocation has negative social consequences on students: isolation from peers due to cultural differences and language barriers. Migrant children, defined as those who relocate because of involvement with agriculture- related industries or other seasonal work, [1] are also at a disadvantage because the majority live in extreme poverty and must work with their parents to support their families. These barriers to equal educational attainment for children of migrant workers are present in countries all over the world. Although the inequality in education remains pronounced, government policies, non- governmental organizations , non-profits , and social movements are working to reverse its effects. Barriers to educational success Cultural differences Cultural differences that cause difficulties in assimilation and also lead to prejudice and xenophobia against migrant families are common deterrents from receiving equal educational opportunities. These prejudices can be formalized by restrictive regulations, or they can be informal but negatively affect the learning atmosphere of a school. Students who don't feel welcome or wanted because of their migrant status are less likely to remain in school. [2][3] [4] Additionally, students who struggle with cultural adjustment often fail to form connections and make friends in school, which affects their academic achievement. [5] Language differences Language differences are another common barrier to educational success. Migrant students that speak a language other than the region's dominant language struggle with basic comprehension and literacy , which affects success in school. [2][3] Even students who are fluent in the regions dominant language but face challenges with the written or academic form of the language are often placed in lower-level or special education classes that have the potential to undermine their academic proficiency. Additionally, while a student may have a high level of language acquisition, cultural differences that include short answer responses, unexpected expressions, and mannerisms, can be misunderstood as language deficit. Schools that have contemplated a separate program for second language learning face challenges with limited resources and an insufficient amount of participating students. Language challenges amongst migrant students create a significant barrier given that language deficiency is often tied to alienation and ridicule from peers, and in some cases, academic punishment. [6] Lack of information Migrant parents are often unaware of their children's right to education or are unfamiliar with the structure of the local public education system. For example, many migrant farmworker parents in the United States do not know they have a right to hold copies of their children's transcripts and school records, which are needed to enroll students in new schools. This makes transferring schools more difficult, taking time away from the student's education. [7] After moving to a new place, parents must focus their energy on finding work and providing for their families, which often means that they do not have time to explore educational options for their children. Additionally, most migrant parents speak a different language, which also affects their ability to receive information. [3] Psychological difficulties Trauma and other psychological difficulties are common among migrant populations, especially refugees who are forced into migratory status due to political, social, or religious turmoil at home. Adjustment to a new culture, language, and home is also difficult and can lead to psychological strain on migrant families. [3] According to a 2008 study conducted by the Universities of Melbourne and Hong Kong, migrant students are more prone to depression and separation anxiety than their non-migrant peers. [8] This is apparent in the United States where undocumented students who succeeded in making the difficult journey across the border face psychological difficulties due to fear of being separated from their families through deportation. [9] Another factor contributing to increased rates of depression and anxiety among migrant youth is discrimination in school. In the University of Melbourne study, the demographic that faced the most psychological difficulties were migrant teenage boys who had experienced discrimination in school and/or domestic conflict. [8] Residential dislocation Many difficulties arise due to the movement of migrant students from one school to another. Children often must adjust to new curricula, testing requirements, and they also must navigate different systems of credit accrual. [10] When migrant students move during the middle of a school year, they are often discouraged from enrolling mid-way through a semester, which disrupts education and has lasting psychological effects. Additionally, when students (especially those in migrant farmworker families) anticipate frequent dislocation, they are less likely to enroll in advanced classes that would increase their prospects of attaining a post-secondary education. [7] Living conditions This large field is filled with mobile homes. Temporary accommodation for many migrant workers working on the acres of orchards of Selling Court Farm. Migrant and immigrant children are four times as likely to live in substandard, crowded housing conditions than are non-migrant and non- immigrant children. [9] Many migrant farmworkers live with a large number of extended family members in migrant camps or temporary housing. This density of people in a small, poorly lit and sparsely furnished space is not conducive to studying. Migrant farmworker camps are located close to agricultural fields and not necessarily within walking distance of the local schools, which poses a problem when reliable transportation is also an issue for some families. [7] Many living accommodations have minimal cooking appliances or refrigeration, which for many migrant students means more time spent preparing meals than studying. [5] Some of the migrant worker's accommodations also lack fresh drinking water or sanitation facilities, which increases migrant student's risk of getting sick. [5] Cost The cost of schooling can also prevent equal access to education. Migrant families, especially migrant farm-working families, have low socioeconomic status and can't afford to pay extra fees on schooling. Even in countries where there are no extra fees for migrant students, there is often an economic disincentive to sending a child to school when they could be working to supplement their parents' incomes. [2] [3][4] In the United States Demographics The exact demographics of migrant students in the United States are difficult to calculate because they move across state and national borders, have different levels of citizenship status, and have limited English proficiency, complicating survey and census data. [2][11] However, in 2002, the US Department of Education , estimated that there are 783,867 migrant children who meet the federal definition of "migrant" as set forth in the eligibility requirements for government support (see Government programs below). This refers to children who have moved school districts within the last 3 years due to agricultural work or work in related industries. Race The racial breakdown of these migrant students is 86% Hispanic, 8% White, and less than 3% Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Asian/Pacific Islander. [1] Language 84% of these students speak little to no English, and about 90% speak a language other than English in their homes. The states with the highest level of students with limited English proficiency are Arizona (with 51% LEP migrant students) and Texas (with 37% LEP migrant students). [2] Location Distribution of migrant students in the U.S. [2] State/ Territory Number of MEP Percentage of U.S. Total California 166,793 30.8% Texas 95,703 17.6% Florida 33,068 6.1% Puerto Rico 21,224 3.9% Michigan 19,167 3.5% Oregon 18,494 3.4% Education Of all of the foreign-born migrants in the United States, 22% have less than a 9th grade education. This percentage breaks down differently by country of origin, with migrants from Asia arriving with the most education and migrants from Latin America arriving with the least. [12] Region of Origin Percent of population 25+ years with less than a 9th grade education Total foreign born 22.2% Europe 12.7% Asia 10% Latin America 34.6% Other regions 7.3% Native 4.7% Region of Origin Percent of population with Bachelor's degree or higher Total foreign born 25.8% Europe 32.9% Asia 44.9% Latin America 11.2% Other regions 36.8% Native 25.6% With regards to educational attainment, only six percent of foreign-born migrant farmworkers have completed 12th grade. [13] Legislation and policy Starting in the 1960s, the United States' government has passed a series of legislation intended to improve the lives of migrant and immigrant students. In 1968, the Bilingual Education Act allocated funding to individual school districts for the creation of bilingual education programs. As part of the Equal Educational Opportunity Act (EEOA) of 1974, the federal government required schools to recognize the language barriers in migrant communities and offer support for non-English speaking students. [14] The No Child Left Behind Act , however, created new testing requirements that make it difficult for migrant students who might transfer school districts before taking a required test, negatively affecting their ability to progress in school. Government programs Migrant Education Program In 1965, as part of President Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty ", Title I of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was framed to help support economically disadvantaged students within the United States. However, this act failed to address the specific non-economic barriers faced by migrant workers and their families so it was amended in 1966 to include the Migrant Education Program (MEP). [1] MEP provides support for children of migrant workers through educational services such as extended school days, summer programs, ESL classes, etc. Eligibility requirements are solely based on the mobility of children and not on their economic or cultural struggles as migrants. This was because Title I already focuses on economically disadvantaged children, so it was assumed that children who qualify for MEP would be receiving benefits from those pre-existing anti-poverty programs. To be included in the Migrant Education Program, children must have had moved school districts for temporary or seasonal agricultural work within the past 3 years. [1] The definition of who qualifies has changed several times since 1966. In 1974, the MEP expanded in scope by including migratory fishing, meat-packing, and other agriculture-related jobs into the categories of eligibility. This was also the year that the period of eligibility was increased from 3 years to 6 years after relocating school districts; however, in 1994 with the passage of the Improving America's Schools Act , it was returned to 3 years. In 1994, the definition of who qualified for MEP was further limited to those children who moved school districts for agriculture-related work that represented their family's "principle means of livelihood." [1] In 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act re- authorized MEP and mandated that the federal funding is focused on the "neediest students" with the "highest risk of academic failure". [2] Although NCLB re-authorized MEP, the main goals of the program reflect what was already laid out in the 1960s. These goals include supporting educational programs to address educational disruptions, protecting migrant children from being penalized for the differences between State curriculums and graduation requirements, designing assistance programs to address the special needs of migrant children. [15] The Migrant Education Program also facilitates coordination of educational services between states. [2] The Migrant Student Record Transfer System (MSRTS) and the New Generation System (NGS) collect students' records and mails them between school districts, which helps provide continuity in education for students who move across state lines. [1] The primary criticism of the EDEA's Migrant Education Program is its constantly evolving definition of "migrant student", which makes counting the number of migrants and analyzing statistics difficult. Second, not all migrants are treated equally by the EDEA: former migrant families that have permanently settled down are not included in the definition of "migrant" so they aren't eligible for the benefits of MEP despite still being at a disadvantage. Third, the MEP doesn't resolve the problem of students moving schools across state lines, learning different curriculums, and then struggling with state- specific standardized tests. [16] High School Equivalency Program The High School Equivalency Program (HEP) is designed to assist migratory and seasonal farm workers to obtain the equivalent to a high school diploma, to find additional skill training or post- secondary schooling, or to find employment. Each year, it serves at least 7,000 students who qualify for the program by being 16 years of age or older and not currently enrolled in school. [17] The HEP is tailored to the needs of migrant workers by being flexible and allowing students to attend classes based on their own convenience. Additionally, the HEP provides free transportation, and all of its staff members are bilingual. [18] College Assistance Migrant Program The College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP) is the only national support program aimed at supporting migrant students through the college experience. CAMP was originally created through the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity program of 1972 before being shifted to the U.S. Department of Labor the following year and to the U.S. Department of Education in 1980. CAMP is funded through discretionary grants that are granted to different non-profit organizations and institutions of higher education. These grants are awarded so that different institutions can provide financial aid, career counseling, tutoring, summer enrichment programs, etc. for migrant students. [19] One of the criticisms of CAMP is that there are not enough spaces available for every eligible student who applies for support. Right now, CAMP only supports roughly 2000 college students per year. [20] Furthermore, due to an increase in undergraduate tuition rates, the number of students supported by CAMP has decreased. [19] Migrant Education Even Start The Migrant Education Even Start Program is focused on improving the literacy of migrant children and adults by supporting existing family literacy projects that operate through the government, universities, private organizations, etc. [21] The Even Start program is focused on increasing children's and families' capabilities by using migrant families' existing resources, cultural traditions, and networks to jumpstart their success. The instructional services included in this program include Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, English as a Second Language, and GED certification. The downside to the Even Start program is that many adults are not able to complete their education due to time constraints and lack of childcare. [22] Nonprofit assistance In addition to government programs, many non- profit organizations work to help migrant workers and their children achieve educational success. Many programs focus on assisting migrant workers to secure work and decent living conditions, while other programs focus on education. Non-profit organizations offer different types of educational services for migrant workers and their children. Some work with migrants to upgrade or teach technical skills that would be helpful for finding employment. Other organizations aim to educate migrants on workplace rights, so that they are knowledgeable on how to handle workplace abuse, which is common among undocumented migrant workers. [23] The most widely utilized form of non-profit assistance is English as a Second Language (ESL) education. Of the 20% of crop workers that have taken at least one adult education class, 10% took English language classes. [24] After English language education, many non-profits offer GED education and tutoring because passing the GED can increase educational and occupational opportunities. [25] Organizations such as Project Avanzando in California provide GED instruction, and services to help students transition into college. [26] For adult learners, participating in these programs can be difficult due to lack of transportation, childcare, confidence, or flexibility in work schedule. [26] Chances of attending adult education classes are higher for crop workers with the most previous educational experiences as well as for authorized workers. Unauthorized workers have a 10% chance of participating in classes versus the 32% chance of authorized workers. [24] Educational success The educational achievement gap between migrant children and non-migrant children is prevalent across the United States. Migrant students generally have lower standardized test scores than the district or state-wide average. [27] In addition to inequality in test scores, there is a persistent graduation gap between migrant and non-migrant students. The national drop-out rate among migrant farmworker students is 50%. [15] In the population of Hispanic immigrants, graduation completion rates correlate to the age in which the student migrated to the United States. The earlier a student immigrates to the United States, the higher their chances are at completing high school. [25] Age when immigrated to US from Mexico Graduation rate [25] 15 – 21 years 28% 5 – 15 years 40% 0 – 5 years 78% These high drop-out rates are often the result of too many school absences, which is common for students who need to support their families by working in the fields or babysitting younger siblings. Before dropping out, increased absences can lead to migrant students being held back a year in school. The more this happens, the wider the age discrepancy between students becomes, which furthers the likelihood of dropping out of school. [5] Possible solutions Because of the complex and interwoven nature of the different issues facing migrant students, there is no consensus of how to solve the inequalities in educational opportunity, attainment, and achievement. Members of the University of Texas at Austin argue that the creation of "advocate educators," whose role it is to support the rights of migrant students and act as a solution for bridging gaps between educational institutions and students. [28] A 2001 study conducted along the Texas-Mexican border concluded that advocate educators who demonstrated cross-cultural empathy and an understanding of the nature, context, and needs of migrant farmworkers fostered the educational success of migrant students. [28] Teachers who are better educated on the experiences of migrant farmworkers will help eliminate prejudice and low expectations of students, which in turn, will encourage students to perform better in school. Along these lines, it is also argued that combatting prejudice and racial stereotypes within the wider community will help decrease prejudice in school and help migrant students. [5] Other suggested interventions include finding a more efficient way of making up absences or missed curriculum due to school transfers and increasing the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers. Studies suggest that students have to stay after school constantly to make-up missed work lose motivation and become quickly discouraged with the educational system. By raising the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers, policy makers would decrease the opportunity cost of education because children would no longer be needed to financially support the family. [5] In China Classroom in a school for migrant students in Beijing (Dongba district). See also: Migrant School The primary form of migration within China isn't that of rural-rural farming migration, but that of rural-urban migration. Through the hukou system, a form of citizenship registration, the Chinese government divides citizens into one of two categories of: urban or rural. Historically, this has created a hierarchy between urban and rural citizens because strict regulations give urbanites more access to healthcare, education, food, etc. Migration has led to a changing demographic of cities. According to the 2010 Census, 210 million urban-to-rural migrants are living in cities, without official hukou registration. Of these migrants, about 20 million are children between the ages of 6 and 14 years struggling to receive quality education because they are not registered within the school district. [29] Many local governments require that everyone complete at least 9 years of education; however, migrant children weren't allowed to enroll in urban schools until 1996. The Ministry of Education issued "Provisional Measures for the Education of Migrant Children" in 1998, but because this was not actually legally binding, many factors continue to prohibit migrants from receiving education: The hukou system requires that rural children must pay extra fees to attend urban schools. [30] School administrations require migrant children to show at least 9 official documents before enrolling, including a temporary residence certificate (which requires that the child's parents have a work permit and money to pay for the certificate). Many public schools require fees like the "education compensation fee" and the "temporary schooling fee" specifically for migrant children. [4] For rural migrant children who do succeed in enrolling in state schools, discrimination is prevalent: in most schools, migrant children do not receive official grades and can not receive academic honors. Because of this, many parents choose to send their children to unlicensed, privately run migrant-specific ("black") schools. The quality of education in these schools is poor because they lack the same resources as state schools—specifically qualified teachers. Depending on the region, these "black" schools are also under threat of closure. In 2007 in Shanghai , every unlicensed migrant school in the center of the city was closed. However, schools on the outskirts of the city and in the majority migrant Xiamen Special Economic Zone , 34 unlicensed schools were allowed. Researchers cite the Chinese government's quest for "population quality" as the primary reason for continued exclusionary policies against rural migrants. However, there are other consequences to the continuation of these policies, as explained by Charlotte Goodburn: In South Africa School children in Hermanus, South Africa South Africa's migrant population is mainly composed of refugee groups from other countries in Africa. The South African Constitution guarantees refugees and asylum seekers the right to education. However, in addition to the widespread xenophobia and prejudice, migrants face many systemic barriers that reduce their educational attainment. [31] One such barrier in South Africa is that many migrants are turned away from public schooling because of a lack of documentation (such as report cards, transfer forms, birth certificates, etc.) Second, language difference is a significant barrier for students from French or Portuguese- speaking countries who must continue their education in the predominantly English-speaking South Africa. Third, according to the Gauteng Department of Education, the recent influx of migrants has "led to enormous pressure on the education system, resulting in overcrowding in ... schools." [3] South African civil society organizations, such as People Against Suffering, Oppression and Poverty ( PASSOP ) and Agency for Refugee Educational Skills and Advocacy are working to combat the issue of migrant education. Community based social movements such as the Equal Education movement are fighting for educational equality in South Africa through research, analysis, and activism. The Three2Six Project, which is donor- funded, also helps by offering free schooling to migrant children who are turned away from public schools. [3] See also Achievement gap in the United States Educational attainment in the United States Educational inequality Job migration Migration in the People's Republic of China Multicultural education Office of Migrant Education Racial achievement gap in the United States Working class education References 1. ^ a b c d e f Branz-Spall, Angela Maria L. (2003). "Children of the Road: Migrant Students, Our Nation's Most Mobile Population". Journal of Negro Education. 72 (1). 2. ^ a b c d e f g h Kindler, Anneka L. (1995). "Education of Migrant Children in the United States". Directions in Language and Education. 1 (8). 3. ^ a b c d e f g Hlatshwayo, Mondli (2014). "The Right to Education for Child Migrants in South Africa". School Psychology International. 35 (3): 266–279. doi: 10.1177/0143034313511004 . 4. ^ a b c d Goodburn, Charlotte (2009). "Learning from migrant education: A case study of the schooling of rural migrant children in Beijing". International Journal of Educational Development . 29 : 495–504. doi : 10.1016/ j.ijedudev.2009.04.005 . 5. ^ a b c d e f Martinez, Yolanda G. (1996). "Migrant Farmworker Students and the Educational Process: Barriers to High School Completeion". The High School Journal. 80 (1): 28–38. 6. ^ McBrien, Lynn (2005). "Educational Needs and Barriers for Refugee Students in the United States: A Review of the Literature" (PDF). Review of Educational Research . 75 (3): 329– 364. Retrieved 3 February 2018. 7. ^ a b c Solis, Jorge (2004). "Scholastic Demands on Intrastate and Interstate Migrant Secondary Students". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 8. ^ a b Wong, F. K. D. (2009). "Correlates of psychological wellbeing of children of migrant workers in Shanghai, China". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 44 (10): 815–824. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0003-y . 9. ^ a b Waters, Mary (2007). The New Americans: A guide to immigration since 1965. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 10. ^ Baca, Leonard (2004). "Foreword". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 11. ^ "Farmworker Factsheet: Demographics" (PDF). ncfh.org . National Center for Farmworker Health. 12. ^ Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo (2001). "Globalization, Immigration, and Education: The Research Agenda". Harvard Educational Review. 71 (3). 13. ^ Carrol, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). U.S. Department of Labor . 14. ^ Pappamihiel, Eleni. "The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant education in our courts and government". Scholars in the Field: Challenges in Migrant Education. 15. ^ a b "Part C: Education of Migratory Children" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 19 October 2014. 16. ^ Papamihiel, Eleni (2004). The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant Education in Our Courts and Government . WP AEL Inc. pp. 13–27. 17. ^ "Migrant Education--High School Equivalency Program" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. 18. ^ Veldzquez, Loldu (1996). "Voices from the fields: community-based migrant education". New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 70 : 27–35. 19. ^ a b "Invisible Children: A Portrait of Migrant Education in the United States". National Commission of Migrant Education, Washington, DC. 1992. 20. ^ "Migrant Education --College Assistance Migrant Education Program" . ed.gov . 21. ^ "Migrant Education Even Start" . ed.gov . 22. ^ Ward, Patricia (2004). "An Integrated Approach: Even Start Family Literacy Model for Migrant Families". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 23. ^ Martin, Nina. "There is Abuse Everywhere: Migrant Nonprofit Organizations and the Problem of Precarious Work". Urban Affairs Review. 48 (3). 24. ^ a b Carroll, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). US Dept of Labor. 25. ^ a b c Grogger, Jeffrey (2002). Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of Mexican Americans. San Francisco, California: Public Policy Institute of California. 26. ^ a b Pablo, Jasis (2010). "All for Our Children: Migrant Families and Parent Participation in an Alternative Education Program". Journal of Latinos and Education . 9 (2): 126–140. 27. ^ Marcus, Kenneth. "Migrant Students: Resources for Migrant Children Similar to Other Students but Achievement Still Lags" (PDF). Florida Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. 28. ^ a b Salinas, Cinthia (2004). "Creating successful academic programs for Chicana/o High school migrant students: the role of advocate educators". High school journal. 87 (4). 29. ^ Chen, Yuanyuan; Feng, Shuaizhang (2013). "Access to public schools and the education of migrant children in China". China Economic Review. 26 : 75–88. doi: 10.1016/ j.chieco.2013.04.007 . 30. ^ Liang, Zai; Por Chen, Yiu (2007). "The educational consequences of migration for children in China". Social Science Research . 36 : 28–47. doi: 10.1016/ j.ssresearch.2005.09.003 . 31. ^ Amisi, Baruti; Ballard, Richard (2005). "In the Absence of Citizenship: Congolese refugee struggle and organisation in South Africa". External links Office of Migrant Education Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of Use • Privacy • Desktop |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT A school for the children of white migrant farm workers, circa 1945 Children of migrant workers struggle to achieve the same level of educational success as their peers. Relocation causes discontinuity in education, which causes migrant students to progress slowly through school and drop out at high rates. Additionally, relocation has negative social consequences on students: isolation from peers due to cultural differences and language barriers. Migrant children, defined as those who relocate because of involvement with agriculture- related industries or other seasonal work, [1] are also at a disadvantage because the majority live in extreme poverty and must work with their parents to support their families. These barriers to equal educational attainment for children of migrant workers are present in countries all over the world. Although the inequality in education remains pronounced, government policies, non- governmental organizations , non-profits , and social movements are working to reverse its effects. Barriers to educational success Cultural differences Cultural differences that cause difficulties in assimilation and also lead to prejudice and xenophobia against migrant families are common deterrents from receiving equal educational opportunities. These prejudices can be formalized by restrictive regulations, or they can be informal but negatively affect the learning atmosphere of a school. Students who don't feel welcome or wanted because of their migrant status are less likely to remain in school. [2][3] [4] Additionally, students who struggle with cultural adjustment often fail to form connections and make friends in school, which affects their academic achievement. [5] Language differences Language differences are another common barrier to educational success. Migrant students that speak a language other than the region's dominant language struggle with basic comprehension and literacy , which affects success in school. [2][3] Even students who are fluent in the regions dominant language but face challenges with the written or academic form of the language are often placed in lower-level or special education classes that have the potential to undermine their academic proficiency. Additionally, while a student may have a high level of language acquisition, cultural differences that include short answer responses, unexpected expressions, and mannerisms, can be misunderstood as language deficit. Schools that have contemplated a separate program for second language learning face challenges with limited resources and an insufficient amount of participating students. Language challenges amongst migrant students create a significant barrier given that language deficiency is often tied to alienation and ridicule from peers, and in some cases, academic punishment. [6] Lack of information Migrant parents are often unaware of their children's right to education or are unfamiliar with the structure of the local public education system. For example, many migrant farmworker parents in the United States do not know they have a right to hold copies of their children's transcripts and school records, which are needed to enroll students in new schools. This makes transferring schools more difficult, taking time away from the student's education. [7] After moving to a new place, parents must focus their energy on finding work and providing for their families, which often means that they do not have time to explore educational options for their children. Additionally, most migrant parents speak a different language, which also affects their ability to receive information. [3] Psychological difficulties Trauma and other psychological difficulties are common among migrant populations, especially refugees who are forced into migratory status due to political, social, or religious turmoil at home. Adjustment to a new culture, language, and home is also difficult and can lead to psychological strain on migrant families. [3] According to a 2008 study conducted by the Universities of Melbourne and Hong Kong, migrant students are more prone to depression and separation anxiety than their non-migrant peers. [8] This is apparent in the United States where undocumented students who succeeded in making the difficult journey across the border face psychological difficulties due to fear of being separated from their families through deportation. [9] Another factor contributing to increased rates of depression and anxiety among migrant youth is discrimination in school. In the University of Melbourne study, the demographic that faced the most psychological difficulties were migrant teenage boys who had experienced discrimination in school and/or domestic conflict. [8] Residential dislocation Many difficulties arise due to the movement of migrant students from one school to another. Children often must adjust to new curricula, testing requirements, and they also must navigate different systems of credit accrual. [10] When migrant students move during the middle of a school year, they are often discouraged from enrolling mid-way through a semester, which disrupts education and has lasting psychological effects. Additionally, when students (especially those in migrant farmworker families) anticipate frequent dislocation, they are less likely to enroll in advanced classes that would increase their prospects of attaining a post-secondary education. [7] Living conditions This large field is filled with mobile homes. Temporary accommodation for many migrant workers working on the acres of orchards of Selling Court Farm. Migrant and immigrant children are four times as likely to live in substandard, crowded housing conditions than are non-migrant and non- immigrant children. [9] Many migrant farmworkers live with a large number of extended family members in migrant camps or temporary housing. This density of people in a small, poorly lit and sparsely furnished space is not conducive to studying. Migrant farmworker camps are located close to agricultural fields and not necessarily within walking distance of the local schools, which poses a problem when reliable transportation is also an issue for some families. [7] Many living accommodations have minimal cooking appliances or refrigeration, which for many migrant students means more time spent preparing meals than studying. [5] Some of the migrant worker's accommodations also lack fresh drinking water or sanitation facilities, which increases migrant student's risk of getting sick. [5] Cost The cost of schooling can also prevent equal access to education. Migrant families, especially migrant farm-working families, have low socioeconomic status and can't afford to pay extra fees on schooling. Even in countries where there are no extra fees for migrant students, there is often an economic disincentive to sending a child to school when they could be working to supplement their parents' incomes. [2] [3][4] In the United States Demographics The exact demographics of migrant students in the United States are difficult to calculate because they move across state and national borders, have different levels of citizenship status, and have limited English proficiency, complicating survey and census data. [2][11] However, in 2002, the US Department of Education , estimated that there are 783,867 migrant children who meet the federal definition of "migrant" as set forth in the eligibility requirements for government support (see Government programs below). This refers to children who have moved school districts within the last 3 years due to agricultural work or work in related industries. Race The racial breakdown of these migrant students is 86% Hispanic, 8% White, and less than 3% Black, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and Asian/Pacific Islander. [1] Language 84% of these students speak little to no English, and about 90% speak a language other than English in their homes. The states with the highest level of students with limited English proficiency are Arizona (with 51% LEP migrant students) and Texas (with 37% LEP migrant students). [2] Location Distribution of migrant students in the U.S. [2] State/ Territory Number of MEP Percentage of U.S. Total California 166,793 30.8% Texas 95,703 17.6% Florida 33,068 6.1% Puerto Rico 21,224 3.9% Michigan 19,167 3.5% Oregon 18,494 3.4% Education Of all of the foreign-born migrants in the United States, 22% have less than a 9th grade education. This percentage breaks down differently by country of origin, with migrants from Asia arriving with the most education and migrants from Latin America arriving with the least. [12] Region of Origin Percent of population 25+ years with less than a 9th grade education Total foreign born 22.2% Europe 12.7% Asia 10% Latin America 34.6% Other regions 7.3% Native 4.7% Region of Origin Percent of population with Bachelor's degree or higher Total foreign born 25.8% Europe 32.9% Asia 44.9% Latin America 11.2% Other regions 36.8% Native 25.6% With regards to educational attainment, only six percent of foreign-born migrant farmworkers have completed 12th grade. [13] Legislation and policy Starting in the 1960s, the United States' government has passed a series of legislation intended to improve the lives of migrant and immigrant students. In 1968, the Bilingual Education Act allocated funding to individual school districts for the creation of bilingual education programs. As part of the Equal Educational Opportunity Act (EEOA) of 1974, the federal government required schools to recognize the language barriers in migrant communities and offer support for non-English speaking students. [14] The No Child Left Behind Act , however, created new testing requirements that make it difficult for migrant students who might transfer school districts before taking a required test, negatively affecting their ability to progress in school. Government programs Migrant Education Program In 1965, as part of President Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty ", Title I of the 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was framed to help support economically disadvantaged students within the United States. However, this act failed to address the specific non-economic barriers faced by migrant workers and their families so it was amended in 1966 to include the Migrant Education Program (MEP). [1] MEP provides support for children of migrant workers through educational services such as extended school days, summer programs, ESL classes, etc. Eligibility requirements are solely based on the mobility of children and not on their economic or cultural struggles as migrants. This was because Title I already focuses on economically disadvantaged children, so it was assumed that children who qualify for MEP would be receiving benefits from those pre-existing anti-poverty programs. To be included in the Migrant Education Program, children must have had moved school districts for temporary or seasonal agricultural work within the past 3 years. [1] The definition of who qualifies has changed several times since 1966. In 1974, the MEP expanded in scope by including migratory fishing, meat-packing, and other agriculture-related jobs into the categories of eligibility. This was also the year that the period of eligibility was increased from 3 years to 6 years after relocating school districts; however, in 1994 with the passage of the Improving America's Schools Act , it was returned to 3 years. In 1994, the definition of who qualified for MEP was further limited to those children who moved school districts for agriculture-related work that represented their family's "principle means of livelihood." [1] In 2001, the No Child Left Behind Act re- authorized MEP and mandated that the federal funding is focused on the "neediest students" with the "highest risk of academic failure". [2] Although NCLB re-authorized MEP, the main goals of the program reflect what was already laid out in the 1960s. These goals include supporting educational programs to address educational disruptions, protecting migrant children from being penalized for the differences between State curriculums and graduation requirements, designing assistance programs to address the special needs of migrant children. [15] The Migrant Education Program also facilitates coordination of educational services between states. [2] The Migrant Student Record Transfer System (MSRTS) and the New Generation System (NGS) collect students' records and mails them between school districts, which helps provide continuity in education for students who move across state lines. [1] The primary criticism of the EDEA's Migrant Education Program is its constantly evolving definition of "migrant student", which makes counting the number of migrants and analyzing statistics difficult. Second, not all migrants are treated equally by the EDEA: former migrant families that have permanently settled down are not included in the definition of "migrant" so they aren't eligible for the benefits of MEP despite still being at a disadvantage. Third, the MEP doesn't resolve the problem of students moving schools across state lines, learning different curriculums, and then struggling with state- specific standardized tests. [16] High School Equivalency Program The High School Equivalency Program (HEP) is designed to assist migratory and seasonal farm workers to obtain the equivalent to a high school diploma, to find additional skill training or post- secondary schooling, or to find employment. Each year, it serves at least 7,000 students who qualify for the program by being 16 years of age or older and not currently enrolled in school. [17] The HEP is tailored to the needs of migrant workers by being flexible and allowing students to attend classes based on their own convenience. Additionally, the HEP provides free transportation, and all of its staff members are bilingual. [18] College Assistance Migrant Program The College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP) is the only national support program aimed at supporting migrant students through the college experience. CAMP was originally created through the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity program of 1972 before being shifted to the U.S. Department of Labor the following year and to the U.S. Department of Education in 1980. CAMP is funded through discretionary grants that are granted to different non-profit organizations and institutions of higher education. These grants are awarded so that different institutions can provide financial aid, career counseling, tutoring, summer enrichment programs, etc. for migrant students. [19] One of the criticisms of CAMP is that there are not enough spaces available for every eligible student who applies for support. Right now, CAMP only supports roughly 2000 college students per year. [20] Furthermore, due to an increase in undergraduate tuition rates, the number of students supported by CAMP has decreased. [19] Migrant Education Even Start The Migrant Education Even Start Program is focused on improving the literacy of migrant children and adults by supporting existing family literacy projects that operate through the government, universities, private organizations, etc. [21] The Even Start program is focused on increasing children's and families' capabilities by using migrant families' existing resources, cultural traditions, and networks to jumpstart their success. The instructional services included in this program include Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, English as a Second Language, and GED certification. The downside to the Even Start program is that many adults are not able to complete their education due to time constraints and lack of childcare. [22] Nonprofit assistance In addition to government programs, many non- profit organizations work to help migrant workers and their children achieve educational success. Many programs focus on assisting migrant workers to secure work and decent living conditions, while other programs focus on education. Non-profit organizations offer different types of educational services for migrant workers and their children. Some work with migrants to upgrade or teach technical skills that would be helpful for finding employment. Other organizations aim to educate migrants on workplace rights, so that they are knowledgeable on how to handle workplace abuse, which is common among undocumented migrant workers. [23] The most widely utilized form of non-profit assistance is English as a Second Language (ESL) education. Of the 20% of crop workers that have taken at least one adult education class, 10% took English language classes. [24] After English language education, many non-profits offer GED education and tutoring because passing the GED can increase educational and occupational opportunities. [25] Organizations such as Project Avanzando in California provide GED instruction, and services to help students transition into college. [26] For adult learners, participating in these programs can be difficult due to lack of transportation, childcare, confidence, or flexibility in work schedule. [26] Chances of attending adult education classes are higher for crop workers with the most previous educational experiences as well as for authorized workers. Unauthorized workers have a 10% chance of participating in classes versus the 32% chance of authorized workers. [24] Educational success The educational achievement gap between migrant children and non-migrant children is prevalent across the United States. Migrant students generally have lower standardized test scores than the district or state-wide average. [27] In addition to inequality in test scores, there is a persistent graduation gap between migrant and non-migrant students. The national drop-out rate among migrant farmworker students is 50%. [15] In the population of Hispanic immigrants, graduation completion rates correlate to the age in which the student migrated to the United States. The earlier a student immigrates to the United States, the higher their chances are at completing high school. [25] Age when immigrated to US from Mexico Graduation rate [25] 15 – 21 years 28% 5 – 15 years 40% 0 – 5 years 78% These high drop-out rates are often the result of too many school absences, which is common for students who need to support their families by working in the fields or babysitting younger siblings. Before dropping out, increased absences can lead to migrant students being held back a year in school. The more this happens, the wider the age discrepancy between students becomes, which furthers the likelihood of dropping out of school. [5] Possible solutions Because of the complex and interwoven nature of the different issues facing migrant students, there is no consensus of how to solve the inequalities in educational opportunity, attainment, and achievement. Members of the University of Texas at Austin argue that the creation of "advocate educators," whose role it is to support the rights of migrant students and act as a solution for bridging gaps between educational institutions and students. [28] A 2001 study conducted along the Texas-Mexican border concluded that advocate educators who demonstrated cross-cultural empathy and an understanding of the nature, context, and needs of migrant farmworkers fostered the educational success of migrant students. [28] Teachers who are better educated on the experiences of migrant farmworkers will help eliminate prejudice and low expectations of students, which in turn, will encourage students to perform better in school. Along these lines, it is also argued that combatting prejudice and racial stereotypes within the wider community will help decrease prejudice in school and help migrant students. [5] Other suggested interventions include finding a more efficient way of making up absences or missed curriculum due to school transfers and increasing the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers. Studies suggest that students have to stay after school constantly to make-up missed work lose motivation and become quickly discouraged with the educational system. By raising the minimum wage of migrant farmworkers, policy makers would decrease the opportunity cost of education because children would no longer be needed to financially support the family. [5] In China Classroom in a school for migrant students in Beijing (Dongba district). See also: Migrant School The primary form of migration within China isn't that of rural-rural farming migration, but that of rural-urban migration. Through the hukou system, a form of citizenship registration, the Chinese government divides citizens into one of two categories of: urban or rural. Historically, this has created a hierarchy between urban and rural citizens because strict regulations give urbanites more access to healthcare, education, food, etc. Migration has led to a changing demographic of cities. According to the 2010 Census, 210 million urban-to-rural migrants are living in cities, without official hukou registration. Of these migrants, about 20 million are children between the ages of 6 and 14 years struggling to receive quality education because they are not registered within the school district. [29] Many local governments require that everyone complete at least 9 years of education; however, migrant children weren't allowed to enroll in urban schools until 1996. The Ministry of Education issued "Provisional Measures for the Education of Migrant Children" in 1998, but because this was not actually legally binding, many factors continue to prohibit migrants from receiving education: The hukou system requires that rural children must pay extra fees to attend urban schools. [30] School administrations require migrant children to show at least 9 official documents before enrolling, including a temporary residence certificate (which requires that the child's parents have a work permit and money to pay for the certificate). Many public schools require fees like the "education compensation fee" and the "temporary schooling fee" specifically for migrant children. [4] For rural migrant children who do succeed in enrolling in state schools, discrimination is prevalent: in most schools, migrant children do not receive official grades and can not receive academic honors. Because of this, many parents choose to send their children to unlicensed, privately run migrant-specific ("black") schools. The quality of education in these schools is poor because they lack the same resources as state schools—specifically qualified teachers. Depending on the region, these "black" schools are also under threat of closure. In 2007 in Shanghai , every unlicensed migrant school in the center of the city was closed. However, schools on the outskirts of the city and in the majority migrant Xiamen Special Economic Zone , 34 unlicensed schools were allowed. Researchers cite the Chinese government's quest for "population quality" as the primary reason for continued exclusionary policies against rural migrants. However, there are other consequences to the continuation of these policies, as explained by Charlotte Goodburn: In South Africa School children in Hermanus, South Africa South Africa's migrant population is mainly composed of refugee groups from other countries in Africa. The South African Constitution guarantees refugees and asylum seekers the right to education. However, in addition to the widespread xenophobia and prejudice, migrants face many systemic barriers that reduce their educational attainment. [31] One such barrier in South Africa is that many migrants are turned away from public schooling because of a lack of documentation (such as report cards, transfer forms, birth certificates, etc.) Second, language difference is a significant barrier for students from French or Portuguese- speaking countries who must continue their education in the predominantly English-speaking South Africa. Third, according to the Gauteng Department of Education, the recent influx of migrants has "led to enormous pressure on the education system, resulting in overcrowding in ... schools." [3] South African civil society organizations, such as People Against Suffering, Oppression and Poverty ( PASSOP ) and Agency for Refugee Educational Skills and Advocacy are working to combat the issue of migrant education. Community based social movements such as the Equal Education movement are fighting for educational equality in South Africa through research, analysis, and activism. The Three2Six Project, which is donor- funded, also helps by offering free schooling to migrant children who are turned away from public schools. [3] See also Achievement gap in the United States Educational attainment in the United States Educational inequality Job migration Migration in the People's Republic of China Multicultural education Office of Migrant Education Racial achievement gap in the United States Working class education References 1. ^ a b c d e f Branz-Spall, Angela Maria L. (2003). "Children of the Road: Migrant Students, Our Nation's Most Mobile Population". Journal of Negro Education. 72 (1). 2. ^ a b c d e f g h Kindler, Anneka L. (1995). "Education of Migrant Children in the United States". Directions in Language and Education. 1 (8). 3. ^ a b c d e f g Hlatshwayo, Mondli (2014). "The Right to Education for Child Migrants in South Africa". School Psychology International. 35 (3): 266–279. doi: 10.1177/0143034313511004 . 4. ^ a b c d Goodburn, Charlotte (2009). "Learning from migrant education: A case study of the schooling of rural migrant children in Beijing". International Journal of Educational Development . 29 : 495–504. doi : 10.1016/ j.ijedudev.2009.04.005 . 5. ^ a b c d e f Martinez, Yolanda G. (1996). "Migrant Farmworker Students and the Educational Process: Barriers to High School Completeion". The High School Journal. 80 (1): 28–38. 6. ^ McBrien, Lynn (2005). "Educational Needs and Barriers for Refugee Students in the United States: A Review of the Literature" (PDF). Review of Educational Research . 75 (3): 329– 364. Retrieved 3 February 2018. 7. ^ a b c Solis, Jorge (2004). "Scholastic Demands on Intrastate and Interstate Migrant Secondary Students". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 8. ^ a b Wong, F. K. D. (2009). "Correlates of psychological wellbeing of children of migrant workers in Shanghai, China". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 44 (10): 815–824. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0003-y . 9. ^ a b Waters, Mary (2007). The New Americans: A guide to immigration since 1965. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 10. ^ Baca, Leonard (2004). "Foreword". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 11. ^ "Farmworker Factsheet: Demographics" (PDF). ncfh.org . National Center for Farmworker Health. 12. ^ Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo (2001). "Globalization, Immigration, and Education: The Research Agenda". Harvard Educational Review. 71 (3). 13. ^ Carrol, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). U.S. Department of Labor . 14. ^ Pappamihiel, Eleni. "The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant education in our courts and government". Scholars in the Field: Challenges in Migrant Education. 15. ^ a b "Part C: Education of Migratory Children" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 19 October 2014. 16. ^ Papamihiel, Eleni (2004). The Legislation of Migrancy: Migrant Education in Our Courts and Government . WP AEL Inc. pp. 13–27. 17. ^ "Migrant Education--High School Equivalency Program" . ed.gov . U.S. Department of Education. 18. ^ Veldzquez, Loldu (1996). "Voices from the fields: community-based migrant education". New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 70 : 27–35. 19. ^ a b "Invisible Children: A Portrait of Migrant Education in the United States". National Commission of Migrant Education, Washington, DC. 1992. 20. ^ "Migrant Education --College Assistance Migrant Education Program" . ed.gov . 21. ^ "Migrant Education Even Start" . ed.gov . 22. ^ Ward, Patricia (2004). "An Integrated Approach: Even Start Family Literacy Model for Migrant Families". Scholars in the Field: The Challenges of Migrant Education. 23. ^ Martin, Nina. "There is Abuse Everywhere: Migrant Nonprofit Organizations and the Problem of Precarious Work". Urban Affairs Review. 48 (3). 24. ^ a b Carroll, Daniel. "A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farm Workers" (PDF). US Dept of Labor. 25. ^ a b c Grogger, Jeffrey (2002). Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of Mexican Americans. San Francisco, California: Public Policy Institute of California. 26. ^ a b Pablo, Jasis (2010). "All for Our Children: Migrant Families and Parent Participation in an Alternative Education Program". Journal of Latinos and Education . 9 (2): 126–140. 27. ^ Marcus, Kenneth. "Migrant Students: Resources for Migrant Children Similar to Other Students but Achievement Still Lags" (PDF). Florida Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights. 28. ^ a b Salinas, Cinthia (2004). "Creating successful academic programs for Chicana/o High school migrant students: the role of advocate educators". High school journal. 87 (4). 29. ^ Chen, Yuanyuan; Feng, Shuaizhang (2013). "Access to public schools and the education of migrant children in China". China Economic Review. 26 : 75–88. doi: 10.1016/ j.chieco.2013.04.007 . 30. ^ Liang, Zai; Por Chen, Yiu (2007). "The educational consequences of migration for children in China". Social Science Research . 36 : 28–47. doi: 10.1016/ j.ssresearch.2005.09.003 . 31. ^ Amisi, Baruti; Ballard, Richard (2005). "In the Absence of Citizenship: Congolese refugee struggle and organisation in South Africa". External links Office of Migrant Education Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of Use • Privacy • Desktop |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:38 PM PDT Education For All (EFA) is a global movement led by UNESCO (United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), aiming to meet the learning needs of all children, youth and adults by 2015. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:33 PM PDT TEACHER AUTONOMY LAST UPDATED: 08.12.14 The concept of teacher autonomy refers to the professional independence of teachers in schools, especially the degree to which they can make autonomous decisions about what they teach to students and how they teach it. In recent years, teacher autonomy has become a major point of discussion and debate in American public education, largely as a result of educational policies that, some argue, limit the professionalism, authority, responsiveness, creativity, or effectiveness of teachers. While teacher autonomy is most frequently discussed in terms of what teachers teach to students and how they teach it, the issue may also manifest in other ways. For example, some schools are entirely led and managed by teachers—i.e., the schools do not have formal administrators; teachers assume administrative roles, usually on a revolving basis. In addition, the composition and negotiation of teacher contracts may also vary significantly from place to place. For example, local teachers unions will negotiate annual contracts with school districts in some states, while most states have statewide teacher contracts that are negotiated by state teachers unions. Depending on its provisions, teaching contracts can directly affect professional autonomy, given that contracts may, for example, determine the specific number of hours that teachers can work each week or limit the roles that teachers can play in a school or district. For a related discussion, see autonomy. Debate While debates related to teacher autonomy vary from place to place, the professionalism of teachers is typically a central issue in the debates. Many educators, and groups such as teachers unions or membership-based professional organizations for teachers, may argue that infringing on teacher autonomy in the classroom undermines the professional status and expertise of teachers. In this view, attempts to micromanage teaching strategies or teacher performance through more prescriptive policies, greater administrative oversight, or strict curriculum requirements will undermine job satisfaction or the perception that teachers are skilled professionals who have earned a degree of public trust in their abilities. Advocates of greater teacher autonomy may also argue that because teachers are in the best position to make informed decisions about a student's education, they should be given as much autonomy as possible when it comes to choosing instructional strategies, designing lessons, and providing academic support. In this view, more stringent regulations, tougher job requirements, greater administrative oversight, or more burdensome teacher-evaluation procedures, for example, will inevitability stifle the instructional creativity and responsiveness of teachers, which could produce a variety of negative results, including lower student performance or higher job dissatisfaction and attrition rates among teachers. Given that no policy that is applied to all teachers can take into account the myriad abilities and needs of students, the reasoning goes, important decisions about educating students should be left to teachers. Similarly, local school leaders and administrators are better positioned to determine the performance of teachers, rather than blanket policies that are applied to all teachers in a district or state, such as valued-added measures —i.e., formulas used to estimate or quantify how much of a positive (or negative) effect individual teachers have on student learning during the course of a given school year. Critics of teacher autonomy tend to cite evidence that teaching quality is uneven, and that problems such as achievement gaps or low graduation rates indicate that measures need to be taken to improve the effectiveness of teachers and public-school instruction. While the proposed solutions to ineffective teaching are numerous, proposals may include greater administrative oversight, increased educational and professional requirements for new teachers, prepackaged or "scripted" curriculum materials, more demanding evaluation systems for job performance, or penalties for poor-performing teachers, for example. The following examples will help to illustrate a few of the primary issues giving rise to debates about teacher autonomy: Testing policies: High-stakes tests—exams used to make important decisions about schools, educators, or students—are widely considered to cause a phenomenon known as "teaching to the test"—i.e., educators focusing their instruction on the topics that are most likely to be tested, or spending classroom time prepping students for tests rather than teaching them knowledge and skills that may be more important. If penalties are imposed on schools, educators, students, or teachers due to test results, critics argue, teachers will inevitably have less autonomy over the instructional process because they will be forced to "teach to the test." As the use of standardized tests has grown in the United States in recent decades, educators have increasingly expressed concern about the consequences of such policies, including the consideration of student test scores in the job- performance evaluations of teachers—a highly controversial subject among educators and teachers unions. Standards policies: All fifty states in the United States have developed and adopted learning standards—concise, written descriptions of what students are expected to know and be able to do at a specific stage of their education—that establish learning goals for students in kindergarten through high school. Consequently, when schools " align " their academic programs and curriculum with the learning goals described in standards, some argue that teachers will have less "autonomy" in determining the knowledge, skills, and content they teach to students. The extent to which learning standards limit the autonomy of teachers remains a subject of ongoing discussion and debate, but many educators argue that standards do not impose significant limitations on the professional autonomy of teachers. For example, some argue that standards only describe broad learning expectations, and that they do not tell teachers how to teach or even, to a great extent, what to teach. For example, a standard that requires students to demonstrate understanding how "checks and balances" and "separation of powers" work in American government does not require teachers to teach those ideas in any specific way—they can use any number of instructional approaches, learning materials, or historical examples to teach students the concepts described in the standards. Curriculum policies: Some states, districts, and schools have policies related to curriculum that may affect teacher autonomy to a greater or lesser extent. For example, some districts and schools require teachers to use "scripted curriculum"—i.e., a prescriptive, standardized, prepackaged form of curriculum that may require teachers to follow a particular sequence of prepackaged lessons and, in some cases, read aloud from a teaching script in class. Though the term is now considered pejorative and rarely used, forms of scripted curriculum were called "teacher-proof curriculum" in past decades. Clearly, the professional autonomy of individual teachers will be significantly limited when such a curriculum system is mandated. In other districts or schools, teachers may be required to use certain texts or instructional approaches, or follow "pacing guides" that outline a specific sequence of lessons and content. For example, teachers may be required to have students reading a designated chapter in a particular textbook on a certain day of the school year. Depending on the level of prescription, and whether they are voluntary guidelines or mandates, curriculum policies can directly affect the instructional autonomy of teachers. Promotion policies: Some states, districts, and schools have policies related to grade promotion or graduation that may limit the ability of teachers to play a role in the process of deciding how and when students will be promoted. For example, a district policy may require that students be automatically held back if they fail a course, which could, in some circumstances, supersede a teacher's recommendation that the student be promoted due to certain extenuating factors. Some states may also require students to pass a standardized test before they are promoted to the next grade level or eligible to receive a high school diploma (for a related discussion, see high-stakes test). Other policies may require a particular course of corrective action when students fail a course, which could also have implications for teacher autonomy. For example, students who fail a course may be required to complete a credit-recovery program—such as an online course or summer- school program—that may not mirror the content taught in the course the student failed. In this case, the teacher may not have a say in how their students "recover" the credit they failed to earn in the teacher's class. Evaluation policies: Discussions and debates about "teacher evaluation" and "teacher accountability" have grown more prominent—and contentious—in recent years. Depending on the systems, methods, and criteria used in the job-performance evaluations of teachers, evaluation policies may affect teacher autonomy. If evaluation processes, expectations, and requirements are more stringent or burdensome, it could influence the way that teachers instruct students. For example, if standardized test scores are used in the evaluation process, and if compensation decisions (salaries, bonuses, or "merit-based" pay) are connected to test scores, teachers will be more likely to modify how and what they teach to improve student test results. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT TEACHER AUTONOMY LAST UPDATED: 08.12.14 The concept of teacher autonomy refers to the professional independence of teachers in schools, especially the degree to which they can make autonomous decisions about what they teach to students and how they teach it. In recent years, teacher autonomy has become a major point of discussion and debate in American public education, largely as a result of educational policies that, some argue, limit the professionalism, authority, responsiveness, creativity, or effectiveness of teachers. While teacher autonomy is most frequently discussed in terms of what teachers teach to students and how they teach it, the issue may also manifest in other ways. For example, some schools are entirely led and managed by teachers—i.e., the schools do not have formal administrators; teachers assume administrative roles, usually on a revolving basis. In addition, the composition and negotiation of teacher contracts may also vary significantly from place to place. For example, local teachers unions will negotiate annual contracts with school districts in some states, while most states have statewide teacher contracts that are negotiated by state teachers unions. Depending on its provisions, teaching contracts can directly affect professional autonomy, given that contracts may, for example, determine the specific number of hours that teachers can work each week or limit the roles that teachers can play in a school or district. For a related discussion, see autonomy. Debate While debates related to teacher autonomy vary from place to place, the professionalism of teachers is typically a central issue in the debates. Many educators, and groups such as teachers unions or membership-based professional organizations for teachers, may argue that infringing on teacher autonomy in the classroom undermines the professional status and expertise of teachers. In this view, attempts to micromanage teaching strategies or teacher performance through more prescriptive policies, greater administrative oversight, or strict curriculum requirements will undermine job satisfaction or the perception that teachers are skilled professionals who have earned a degree of public trust in their abilities. Advocates of greater teacher autonomy may also argue that because teachers are in the best position to make informed decisions about a student's education, they should be given as much autonomy as possible when it comes to choosing instructional strategies, designing lessons, and providing academic support. In this view, more stringent regulations, tougher job requirements, greater administrative oversight, or more burdensome teacher-evaluation procedures, for example, will inevitability stifle the instructional creativity and responsiveness of teachers, which could produce a variety of negative results, including lower student performance or higher job dissatisfaction and attrition rates among teachers. Given that no policy that is applied to all teachers can take into account the myriad abilities and needs of students, the reasoning goes, important decisions about educating students should be left to teachers. Similarly, local school leaders and administrators are better positioned to determine the performance of teachers, rather than blanket policies that are applied to all teachers in a district or state, such as valued-added measures —i.e., formulas used to estimate or quantify how much of a positive (or negative) effect individual teachers have on student learning during the course of a given school year. Critics of teacher autonomy tend to cite evidence that teaching quality is uneven, and that problems such as achievement gaps or low graduation rates indicate that measures need to be taken to improve the effectiveness of teachers and public-school instruction. While the proposed solutions to ineffective teaching are numerous, proposals may include greater administrative oversight, increased educational and professional requirements for new teachers, prepackaged or "scripted" curriculum materials, more demanding evaluation systems for job performance, or penalties for poor-performing teachers, for example. The following examples will help to illustrate a few of the primary issues giving rise to debates about teacher autonomy: Testing policies: High-stakes tests—exams used to make important decisions about schools, educators, or students—are widely considered to cause a phenomenon known as "teaching to the test"—i.e., educators focusing their instruction on the topics that are most likely to be tested, or spending classroom time prepping students for tests rather than teaching them knowledge and skills that may be more important. If penalties are imposed on schools, educators, students, or teachers due to test results, critics argue, teachers will inevitably have less autonomy over the instructional process because they will be forced to "teach to the test." As the use of standardized tests has grown in the United States in recent decades, educators have increasingly expressed concern about the consequences of such policies, including the consideration of student test scores in the job- performance evaluations of teachers—a highly controversial subject among educators and teachers unions. Standards policies: All fifty states in the United States have developed and adopted learning standards—concise, written descriptions of what students are expected to know and be able to do at a specific stage of their education—that establish learning goals for students in kindergarten through high school. Consequently, when schools " align " their academic programs and curriculum with the learning goals described in standards, some argue that teachers will have less "autonomy" in determining the knowledge, skills, and content they teach to students. The extent to which learning standards limit the autonomy of teachers remains a subject of ongoing discussion and debate, but many educators argue that standards do not impose significant limitations on the professional autonomy of teachers. For example, some argue that standards only describe broad learning expectations, and that they do not tell teachers how to teach or even, to a great extent, what to teach. For example, a standard that requires students to demonstrate understanding how "checks and balances" and "separation of powers" work in American government does not require teachers to teach those ideas in any specific way—they can use any number of instructional approaches, learning materials, or historical examples to teach students the concepts described in the standards. Curriculum policies: Some states, districts, and schools have policies related to curriculum that may affect teacher autonomy to a greater or lesser extent. For example, some districts and schools require teachers to use "scripted curriculum"—i.e., a prescriptive, standardized, prepackaged form of curriculum that may require teachers to follow a particular sequence of prepackaged lessons and, in some cases, read aloud from a teaching script in class. Though the term is now considered pejorative and rarely used, forms of scripted curriculum were called "teacher-proof curriculum" in past decades. Clearly, the professional autonomy of individual teachers will be significantly limited when such a curriculum system is mandated. In other districts or schools, teachers may be required to use certain texts or instructional approaches, or follow "pacing guides" that outline a specific sequence of lessons and content. For example, teachers may be required to have students reading a designated chapter in a particular textbook on a certain day of the school year. Depending on the level of prescription, and whether they are voluntary guidelines or mandates, curriculum policies can directly affect the instructional autonomy of teachers. Promotion policies: Some states, districts, and schools have policies related to grade promotion or graduation that may limit the ability of teachers to play a role in the process of deciding how and when students will be promoted. For example, a district policy may require that students be automatically held back if they fail a course, which could, in some circumstances, supersede a teacher's recommendation that the student be promoted due to certain extenuating factors. Some states may also require students to pass a standardized test before they are promoted to the next grade level or eligible to receive a high school diploma (for a related discussion, see high-stakes test). Other policies may require a particular course of corrective action when students fail a course, which could also have implications for teacher autonomy. For example, students who fail a course may be required to complete a credit-recovery program—such as an online course or summer- school program—that may not mirror the content taught in the course the student failed. In this case, the teacher may not have a say in how their students "recover" the credit they failed to earn in the teacher's class. Evaluation policies: Discussions and debates about "teacher evaluation" and "teacher accountability" have grown more prominent—and contentious—in recent years. Depending on the systems, methods, and criteria used in the job-performance evaluations of teachers, evaluation policies may affect teacher autonomy. If evaluation processes, expectations, and requirements are more stringent or burdensome, it could influence the way that teachers instruct students. For example, if standardized test scores are used in the evaluation process, and if compensation decisions (salaries, bonuses, or "merit-based" pay) are connected to test scores, teachers will be more likely to modify how and what they teach to improve student test results. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT Nursing is a profession within the health care sector focused on the care of individuals, families, and communities so they may attain, maintain, or recover optimal health and quality of life. Nursing schoo |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:26 PM PDT Nursing is a profession within the health care sector focused on the care of individuals, families, and communities so they may attain, maintain, or recover optimal health and quality of life. Nursing schoo |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:26 PM PDT Nursing is a profession within the health care sector focused on the care of individuals, families, and communities so they may attain, maintain, or recover optimal health and quality of life. Nursing schoo |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT Nursing is a profession within the health care sector focused on the care of individuals, families, and communities so they may attain, maintain, or recover optimal health and quality of life. Nursing schoo |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:22 PM PDT Talking About Drugs With Kids in High School (Ages 15-18) By the time teens enter high school, they have likely had many opportunities to try drugs, alcohol, and/or tobacco. Even if they have resisted the temptation, they've probably seen their peers do it—sometimes to excess and perhaps even with serious consequences. In fact, they may know fellow classmates with addiction issues. You can't choose your children's friends— although parents have been trying for years! But you can encourage them to develop friendships with kids who do not smoke, drink, or do drugs. 1. What they're thinking. Teens this age typically understand how substance use can affect unborn children, how combining drugs can be deadly, and how easy it is to go from casual use to abuse to addiction. Enforce these concepts when talking with your teenager. During the last few years of high school, teens are thinking about what their future holds, so this is a great time to keep reminding them that substance use can ruin their chances of getting into college, being accepted by the military, or being hired for certain jobs. Also, remind them that keeping the community drug free will make it a nicer place to raise a family if they decide to put down roots there. 2. Debating what's legal. An important issue to discuss with your teenager (and with your preteen in middle school) is the debate over medical marijuana. Make sure your child knows that "smoked marijuana" has not withstood the rigors of science—it is not medicine and it is not safe. Marijuana is harmful and it is illegal. 3. Granting independence—with love. Children this age want independence, but you need to set limits. Set curfews and other expectations for your child's behavior, establish appropriate consequences for breaking rules, and consistently follow through with enforcement. Finally, tell children often that you care about them and that they are important to you. Show them you mean it by regularly spending one-on- one time with them. Developing this strong bond will make your child more likely to come to you with questions or concerns about drugs, alcohol, or other sensitive issues—encourage that openness. Remember, even as children are pushing for independence, they need someone they love and respect to be involved. They need YOU! 4. Know what's trendy. Talk with your teen about what you learn here and elsewhere about the dangers of abusing prescription drugs. Non-medical use of prescription medications to get high is rising dramatically. A Pill Identification Database is a good way to help you identify some prescription drugs, but other medications become trendy at times, and other drugs may be specific to your community that aren't shown. Routinely ask your teen which prescription drugs are an issue at school, in friends' homes, and at parties. 5. Drinking or drug use while driving. As teens begin to drive and become even more independent, establish clear rules about drinking or using drugs while driving. Ask for their input; then develop a written agreement that spells out expectations for behavior and specific consequences for breaking the rules. For example, you may want to limit the hours your teen can drive and grant (or deny) permission to transport younger siblings. Whether or not your city or state restricts the number of passengers in your teen's car, you can do so as part of your written agreement. You and your young driver should sign the agreement to give it more credibility, then keep it in a public area of the home to serve as a constant reminder of what is expected. Here are a few other examples you might include. I will not drink alcohol and drive. I will drive only from ____ a.m. until ____ p.m. I will not stay at a party where alcohol is served or drugs are present. I will not ride in a car with a driver who has been drinking or using drugs. 6. The "at home" party. Some parents mistakenly believe "My teens and their friends are safer drinking at home because they aren't out driving while intoxicated." Even if state law permits teens to drink at home at certain ages under a parent's supervision, it doesn't mean you should let them. Doing so may be setting a dangerous example—essentially signaling you approve of what may be illegal consumption of alcohol in other settings. And if you give your teen permission to host a party in your home, never supply alcohol to your child's friends. Not only is it illegal, but you may well be held liable for anything that happens to the minors and any damage they cause— including what happens when they leave the premises. Make sure two responsible adults are present to monitor the festivities in your home. 7. Continue to praise and encourage teenagers for the things they do well and the positive choices they make. Knowing you are proud of them can motivate them to maintain a drug-free lifestyle and to serve as a positive role model for younger siblings. Parenting doesn't stop when a child goes to college. Find out if there is a program during freshman orientation that educates students about campus policies, and health and wellness or prevention programs related to alcohol and other drug use. If so, attend with your child, or at least be familiar with the name of the person who is responsible for campus counseling or prevention programs. Learn about the college's standards of conduct. Federal regulations require any institution of higher education receiving federal funding (most of them do)to have a drug prevention program that prohibits, at a minimum, the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students on campus property or while participating in its activities. Colleges must enforce these standards or risk serious consequences, including loss of federal student financial assistance. Ask about and understand the college's parental notification policy for standards of conduct violations. Make sure your child understands the penalties for underage drinking, public drunkenness, illicit drug use, using a fake ID, driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, assault, and other alcohol-related offenses. Make certain your child understands how alcohol and other illicit drug use and abuse can be associated with date rape, violence, and academic failure, as well as have consequences after graduation. This is also an important time to stress the importance of the responsible consumption of alcohol for when your college-age children are of legal drinking age, and if they choose to drink. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT Talking About Drugs With Kids in High School (Ages 15-18) By the time teens enter high school, they have likely had many opportunities to try drugs, alcohol, and/or tobacco. Even if they have resisted the temptation, they've probably seen their peers do it—sometimes to excess and perhaps even with serious consequences. In fact, they may know fellow classmates with addiction issues. You can't choose your children's friends— although parents have been trying for years! But you can encourage them to develop friendships with kids who do not smoke, drink, or do drugs. 1. What they're thinking. Teens this age typically understand how substance use can affect unborn children, how combining drugs can be deadly, and how easy it is to go from casual use to abuse to addiction. Enforce these concepts when talking with your teenager. During the last few years of high school, teens are thinking about what their future holds, so this is a great time to keep reminding them that substance use can ruin their chances of getting into college, being accepted by the military, or being hired for certain jobs. Also, remind them that keeping the community drug free will make it a nicer place to raise a family if they decide to put down roots there. 2. Debating what's legal. An important issue to discuss with your teenager (and with your preteen in middle school) is the debate over medical marijuana. Make sure your child knows that "smoked marijuana" has not withstood the rigors of science—it is not medicine and it is not safe. Marijuana is harmful and it is illegal. 3. Granting independence—with love. Children this age want independence, but you need to set limits. Set curfews and other expectations for your child's behavior, establish appropriate consequences for breaking rules, and consistently follow through with enforcement. Finally, tell children often that you care about them and that they are important to you. Show them you mean it by regularly spending one-on- one time with them. Developing this strong bond will make your child more likely to come to you with questions or concerns about drugs, alcohol, or other sensitive issues—encourage that openness. Remember, even as children are pushing for independence, they need someone they love and respect to be involved. They need YOU! 4. Know what's trendy. Talk with your teen about what you learn here and elsewhere about the dangers of abusing prescription drugs. Non-medical use of prescription medications to get high is rising dramatically. A Pill Identification Database is a good way to help you identify some prescription drugs, but other medications become trendy at times, and other drugs may be specific to your community that aren't shown. Routinely ask your teen which prescription drugs are an issue at school, in friends' homes, and at parties. 5. Drinking or drug use while driving. As teens begin to drive and become even more independent, establish clear rules about drinking or using drugs while driving. Ask for their input; then develop a written agreement that spells out expectations for behavior and specific consequences for breaking the rules. For example, you may want to limit the hours your teen can drive and grant (or deny) permission to transport younger siblings. Whether or not your city or state restricts the number of passengers in your teen's car, you can do so as part of your written agreement. You and your young driver should sign the agreement to give it more credibility, then keep it in a public area of the home to serve as a constant reminder of what is expected. Here are a few other examples you might include. I will not drink alcohol and drive. I will drive only from ____ a.m. until ____ p.m. I will not stay at a party where alcohol is served or drugs are present. I will not ride in a car with a driver who has been drinking or using drugs. 6. The "at home" party. Some parents mistakenly believe "My teens and their friends are safer drinking at home because they aren't out driving while intoxicated." Even if state law permits teens to drink at home at certain ages under a parent's supervision, it doesn't mean you should let them. Doing so may be setting a dangerous example—essentially signaling you approve of what may be illegal consumption of alcohol in other settings. And if you give your teen permission to host a party in your home, never supply alcohol to your child's friends. Not only is it illegal, but you may well be held liable for anything that happens to the minors and any damage they cause— including what happens when they leave the premises. Make sure two responsible adults are present to monitor the festivities in your home. 7. Continue to praise and encourage teenagers for the things they do well and the positive choices they make. Knowing you are proud of them can motivate them to maintain a drug-free lifestyle and to serve as a positive role model for younger siblings. Parenting doesn't stop when a child goes to college. Find out if there is a program during freshman orientation that educates students about campus policies, and health and wellness or prevention programs related to alcohol and other drug use. If so, attend with your child, or at least be familiar with the name of the person who is responsible for campus counseling or prevention programs. Learn about the college's standards of conduct. Federal regulations require any institution of higher education receiving federal funding (most of them do)to have a drug prevention program that prohibits, at a minimum, the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students on campus property or while participating in its activities. Colleges must enforce these standards or risk serious consequences, including loss of federal student financial assistance. Ask about and understand the college's parental notification policy for standards of conduct violations. Make sure your child understands the penalties for underage drinking, public drunkenness, illicit drug use, using a fake ID, driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, assault, and other alcohol-related offenses. Make certain your child understands how alcohol and other illicit drug use and abuse can be associated with date rape, violence, and academic failure, as well as have consequences after graduation. This is also an important time to stress the importance of the responsible consumption of alcohol for when your college-age children are of legal drinking age, and if they choose to drink. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:18 PM PDT Teamwork is the collaborative effort of a team to achieve a common goal or to complete a task in the most effective and efficient way. This concept is seen within the greater framework of a team, which is a group of interdependent individuals who work together towards a common goal. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:14 PM PDT a fictitious prose narrative of book length, typically representing character and action with some degree of realism. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:13 PM PDT Acting is an activity in which a story is told by means of its enactment by an actor or actress who adopts a character—in theatre, television, film, radio, or any other medium that makes use of the mimetic mode. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:10 PM PDT College can be a great time to explore entrepreneurship. And there are plenty of different business opportunities that college students can start without a lot of upfront expense or time commitment. Here are 50 potential small business opportunities for college students. Business Ideas for College Students Blogger Blogging can offer great opportunities for college students. You can choose a topic or niche that interests you and work to build up an audience on your own schedule. Virtual Assistant You can also work from your home or dorm room as a virtual assistant , offering services like email communications and social media management. Tutor If you have expertise in a specific academic topic, you could offer your services to other college students as a tutor to help them get through specific courses. YouTube Personality YouTube is a great platform for building a business. You can earn money through ad revenue or work with brands as an influencer . Social Media Manager For those who have a fair amount of social media knowledge, you can offer your services to businesses that need help managing their social media accounts . Social Media Influencer You could also build up your own social media accounts and then work with brands as an influencer . Social Media Consultant Or if you'd rather simply offer your expertise to brands so that they can work on their own social media accounts, you can offer your services as a consultant. Podcaster Podcasting is another potential business opportunity that you can work on from your home or dorm room and set your own schedule. Child Caretaker If you're looking for a more low - tech business opportunity, you could offer child care services to parents in your community. Housesitter Or you could serve as a housesitter for people traveling out of town. Dog Walker If you like spending time with dogs, you could start a business as a dog walker and appeal to local pet owners. Pet Groomer You could also start a pet grooming service where you offer to wash and groom animals for a set fee. Inventor There are also plenty of opportunities for college students to invent brand new products and then license or produce those items to sell. Graphic Designer If you have some design skills, you could start a business as a graphic designer, working on logos, branding elements or other designs for clients. Web Designer Web savvy designers could also set up a business designing websites for businesses or individual clients. App Developer Or if you're really skilled with mobile technology, you could start a business developing mobile apps for clients or even making your own and then selling them in app stores. Clothing Designer Fashion savvy college students, you could start your very own clothing line out of your home or dorm and then sell your designs online or in local boutiques. T-shirt Designer Or you could use online marketplaces to offer t- shirts with your own custom designs for sale. Jewelry Maker If you want to make some other unique wearable creations, you can make your own jewelry and sell it online or at local events. Flea Market Vendor You could also sell a variety of different products at flea markets in your area on the weekends. Farmers' Market Vendor Or if you grow or can any of your own food products, you could sell items at farmers' markets on the weekends. Soap Maker Soap is another product that you can easily make in your own home or dorm and then sell online or at craft fairs or events. Candle Maker Or you could make your own scented candles and sell them in one or more of those avenues. Vintage Clothing Seller If you have an extensive vintage collection, you could set up your own online shop where you can sell vintage clothes. Then you can scour resale shops and flea markets for even more vintage finds to sell. Ebook Author If you have enough vision or expertise to write a book, you could self- publish your own ebook and sell it on platforms like Amazon. Ecommerce Reseller You can also pretty easily set up your own ecommerce business on sites like Amazon or eBay and then sell a variety of different types of products. Event Photographer Photographers, use your weekends off from school to start an event photography business where you could photograph weddings, conferences or other events. Portrait Photographer Or you could offer portrait photography services and sell various packages for family photos, senior portraits and more. Recycling Service Provider If you want to start an eco-friendly business, you can offer to pick up select items from people and take those items to local recycling facilities. Book Seller College students often have a lot of books lying around. You could start a business by selling some of those books online and maybe even open up your own shop. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:06 PM PDT Prison education - Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Priso... Prison education is any educational activity that occurs inside prison. Courses can include basic literacy programs, secondary school equivalency programs, vocational education and tertiary education. History · Challenges · Reductions in recidivism Correctional Education | RAND https://www.rand.org › portfolios › corre... Research needs to get inside the " black box" of what does and does not work in correctional education ... Why Prison Education? - Prison Studies Project prisonstudiesproject.org › why-prison-ed... "Prison education is a means of rehabilitating and re-directing. If you release someone with the same skills ... Report Shows Benefit of Prison Education - Inside Higher Ed https://www.insidehighered.com › report-... 16 Jan 2019 · A new report by the Vera Institute of Justice and Georgetown Center on Poverty and ... Benefits of Prison Education - Northwestern University https://sites.northwestern.edu › npep › be... However, there is a 43% reduction in recidivism rates for those prisoners who participate in prison education ... Correctional Education: Adult Education and Literacy https://www2.ed.gov › ovae › AdultEd 27 Feb 2017 · Resources for Adult Education and Literacy in Correctional Settings. PrisonEducation.com | Education in Prison | College & Programs https://prisoneducation.com We help inmates access education in prison, GED & job training programs to reduce recidivism. Use the ... FAQ: Prison Educational Programs - Prison Fellowship https://www.prisonfellowship.org › faq-p... What are some of the prison educational programs available? Can prisoners receive a higher education ... |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:04 PM PDT Student retention will be supported across the entire student learning journey from recruitment to graduation. ... Academic and career advice will be provided to assist students to be retained or, where appropriate, make informed decisions about future pathways and to avoid unnecessary debt and/ or academic penalty. |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 07:00 PM PDT Conclusion A student must be familiar with the history, geography, religion, culture and tradition, through general education. Therefore, general education should aim at educating all students up to the secondary standard. Thereafter, depending upon the aptitude of the student, he should either opt for advanced academic education or join a vocational training institute for skill-based training. By Vikash Chamaria (2015) |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:02 PM PDT Conclusion A student must be familiar with the history, geography, religion, culture and tradition, through general education. Therefore, general education should aim at educating all students up to the secondary standard. Thereafter, depending upon the aptitude of the student, he should either opt for advanced academic education or join a vocational training institute for skill-based training. By Vikash Chamaria (2015) |
Posted: 30 Apr 2019 06:02 PM PDT Advantages of education 1. Education makes us humble. Education creates awareness and expands our vision. We become more aware about ourself, about the society, about everything that surrounds and affect our life. 2. It helps us develop a disciplined life. And, discipline is essential for everything that a person wants to achieve in life. 3. An educated person commands respect in the society. 4. Education enables us to earn our livelihood . Education empowers us to get a good job. We need money to make our living. With the advancement of science and technology, our needs have increased. Besides the basic needs of life such as food, shelter and clothing, we also need other comforts such as mobile phones, air-conditioners, car, etc. A fulfilling career ensures a satisfied life. 5. It is a known fact that an educated person gets better earning opportunities. After completing education, we can consider starting your own business. We can also become a consultant in the area of our expertise. 6. The study of computer science, software, and information technology will empower us to make a choice in the field of fast growing IT and internet industry. 7. We can help illiterate adults to learn the basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic. 8. Education is the key to gender equality and women empowerment . Educated women are self-dependent, and looked upon with dignity. They are aware of their social, and economic rights. Further, they can teach their children and help them in their studies. 9. Education helps in fighting against human rights violations. It helps in getting rid of social problems such as child labour, and child marriage. Education is a fundamental right and every child deserves to get the opportunity for education. |
You are subscribed to email updates from DR. VITUS BLOG. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
0 comments:
Post a Comment